| |
"The Island"
Two men mechanically orbit around the stage in their bare
feet. Sweating, panting, sometimes grunting, they wordlessly migrate, workmanlike, from start
to finish, seeing to obviously appointed, labor-intensive yet meaningless tasks. Only the
mimicked buzz of flies suggests the oppressive weather. Two tin cups, a bucket and otherwise-barren
dais suggests the setting is a prison, though its whereabouts are never made clear. The year, too,
is unknown, as are the two men's crimes and the length of their jail terms.
Thirty years
after its debut, the apartheid-era drama The Island resonates all
the more because of its deliberate lack of specificity. Conceived in
1973 by South African dramatist Athol Fugard in
collaboration with actors John Kani and Winston Ntshona, there were of course some practical considerations
behind such vagueness in the apartheid era. Fugard, Kani and Ntshona were all persecuted over the years by
the South African government under apartheid (Kani and Ntshona were jailed, while Fugard, the lone white
man among them, had had his passport revoked for a time). The Island, recognized by all as Robben Island
(home to political prisoners such as Nelson Mandela) deliberately had no name. Deliberately, a play on an
island without a name, about prisoners without a country, sentences without end and crimes unclear, hits
its intended target in any country, in any place and any time.
Underscoring the endurance and relevance of its universal messages about justice and the abuse of power
is Kristoff Skalet and Teddy Harrell’s reprisal of the play’s lone characters:
cellmates, jailed together for indeterminate sentences, once strangers and now long-time friends. Like trapeze artists, they walk the tightrope and highwire with
unrelenting trust in each other, never needing to check that the other is there.
This fast and loose chemistry is all the more crucial because the two prisoners’ survivalist’s humor, borne
of desperation, is much of what propels "The Island" forward. The play’s creators knew it would be humor, and
humor alone, that would rescue its universal message about the human spirit from being labeled merely a
"political play"– undeniably important but grim and without hope. Through humor, we are willingly led to shed
this story’s tears. The plot, on the surface, is deliberately bare bones: two cellmates, while rehearsing Sophocles’ Antigone, receive incredible news–one of them is to be set free. The actual story, however, is how the two men handle
the news, which may or may not be true. The result is moot. Their friendship is all.
Their last names aren’t given. Their crime, if any, is not made plain. Their sentences are of indeterminate length. Their exact whereabouts
are unknown. Their fates are uncertain. The message, unmistakable and timeless.
|
|